Thursday April 7
Human Destiny
Read Genesis 3:15-24.
3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.
3:16 Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire [shall be] to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
3:17 And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed [is] the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat [of] it all the days of thy life;
3:18 Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;
3:19 In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou [art], and unto dust shalt thou return.
As a result of the Fall, what happened to Adam and Eve?
While God’s judgment of the serpent is explicitly identified as a curse (Gen. 3:14), God’s judgment of the woman and of the man is not. The only time where the word “curse” is used again, it applies only to the “ground” (Gen. 3:17). That is, God had other plans for the man and the woman, as opposed to the serpent. They were offered a hope not offered to him.
Because the woman’s sin is due to her association with the serpent, the verse describing God’s judgment of the woman was related to the judgment of the serpent. Not only does Genesis 3:16 immediately follow Genesis 3:15, but the parallels between the two prophecies clearly indicate that the prophecy concerning the woman in Genesis 3:16 has to be read in connection to the Messianic prophecy in Genesis 3:15. God’s judgment of the woman, including childbearing, should therefore be understood in the positive perspective of salvation (compare with 1 Tim. 2:14, 15).
Positive? Yes, the sorrows to come upon both Eve and Adam were for their good, for their salvation. Then, let us look a little closer by taking 1 Tim. 2:14, 15, in context.
2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
2:15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
Why did Paul bring up this matter having to do with Genesis 3:16? Read why Paul has brought it up......
2:12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
2:13 For Adam was first formed, then Eve.
2:14 And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression.
2:15 Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.
Paul is expressing what God said in Genesis 3:16, and it is for the good of the woman: "Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire [shall be] to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee."
Why is he telling us about Gen 3:16? Because a woman ought not rule over a man. "I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man," "thy desire [shall be] to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee."
Now, we could go on without understanding this, but it would not be good. Why ought we understand Genesis 3:16 in light of 1 Tim 2:12-15? Because Satan has perverted this truth to lead many in God's church into rebellion against God, His Word, and His world-wide church. Women are not to rule over men in the home or in the church. Because the world has come into the church, we see this in the church. How can we expect those in Babylon who are seeking another church come into our church when they see such rebellion against such a simple truth as 1 Tim. 2:12-15 being supported by Genesis 3:16. Yes, it is a matter of salvation for the woman as the lesson pointed to. Then we ought to understand why. Explain this to your Sabbath School class if God be with you.
Because the man’s sin is due to his listening to the woman instead of listening to God, the ground from which man has been taken is cursed (Gen. 3:17). As a result, man will have to work hard (Gen. 3:17-19), and he will then “return” to the ground where he comes from (Gen. 3:19), something that never should have happened, and that was never part of God’s original plan.
It is significant that against this hopeless prospect of death Adam turns, then, to the woman, where he sees the hope of life through her giving birth (Gen. 3:20). That is, even amid the sentence of death, he sees the hope of life.
Meanwhile, as would any loving parent, God had wanted only good for them, not evil. But now that they knew evil, God was going to do all that He could to save them from it. Thus, even amid these judgments, all hope was not lost for our first parents, despite their open and blatant disobedience to God; even though they — living truly in paradise — had absolutely no reason to doubt God, to doubt God’s words, or to doubt His love to them.
Though we tend to think of “knowledge” in and of itself as good, why is that not always the case? What are some things that we are better off not knowing
Knowledge of evil is not helpful. Knowledge of spiritualism is better left alone. We do not need to see pictures of evil in this world such as what is in Fox's Book of Martyrs. Let us focus on what God has done, and is doing for us. We are healed by His stripes. By beholding His glory we are changed into the same image (character, 2 Cor. 3:18).