Global Warming?

[Richard Myers]

Lawyer Burns Himself to Death in NY to Protest Global Warming

Thus contributing to "global warming."

 You would think a lawyer would understand this. In his death he did just what he blamed others for doing. On the other hand, Wally, being a lawyer he probably did his homework and found that by cutting his life short, dying ten years prematurely (3 score and ten minus 10=60) the amount of carbon dioxide he did not produce was a greater saving than the carbon dioxide release by the fire. But, he failed to consider the rest of the foul air he produced besides the carbon dioxide. So in the end, he was like many other lawyers, short sighted. He may have been hoping that there would be rioting in the streets of New York.  All Gore's daughter was active. There is another example that reveals serious difficulties with those who are so concerned about me driving to work or heating my home in a freezing winter. Al used to live a very large house, drive a very large car, and fly in a very large plane. If I lived to be the age of Methuselah (969) I would not produce the amount of carbon dioxide that this active soothsayer has. I won't live that long, not on this Earth. Jesus is coming so very soon!! The world is as it was at the time of the flood. Good is called evil and evil is called good. Come Lord Jesus!

[Cop]

Environmentalists Spread Fake News About Polar Bear’s Sad Death
[Excerpts]

Ideological environmentalists manipulated the death of a starving polar bear to fit their narrative of man-made climate change.

National Geographic said it “went too far” and wrote an apology on Aug. 25 for making an unverified correlation between a dying polar bear, who was likely starving from natural causes, and shrinking polar ice caps.

“We said, ‘This is what climate change looks like.’ While science has established that there is a strong connection between melting sea ice and polar bears dying off, there is no way to know for certain why this bear was on the verge of death,” National Geographic wrote in an editor’s note.

Biologist Paul Nickelsen, who works for SeaLegacy, a Canadian nonprofit environmental protection company, took the picture and video in August 2017 and posted it in December 2017 with the caption, “This is what starvation looks like,” Financial Post reported.

National Geographic published the now-updated article under the subtitle, “This is what climate change looks like.”

SeaLegacy republished the video and made their agenda more obvious with the headline, “This is the face of climate change.”
About 2.5 billion people watched the video that stirred anger against man-made climate change.

Zoologist Susan Crawford made a video on YouTube that examines the scientific community’s manipulation of the story.

The public asked why Nickelsen could not help the polar bear.

“It would also have been illegal to feed him, to approach him, or to do anything to ease his pain,” he said.

Crawford said Nickelsen should have called a conservation officer to euthanize the bear and perform an autopsy to determine the true cause of his starvation, which Crawford said was likely cancer due to the bear’s muscular atrophy.

“But a necropsy result would have hamstrung Nicklen’s plan to use the starving-bear video to spur action on climate change, so he and his crew simply let the bear swim away without telling anyone, extending the animal’s suffering,” Crawford wrote in the Financial Post.

Source: https://www.libertyheadlines.com/fake-news-polar-bears/

[Cop]

SIERRA CLUB: ‘Study’ Says Climate ‘Deniers’ are Racist
[Excerpts]

Elites in the left-wing environmental movement have a new theory about climate change, and it’s one that seems to echo an array of progressive-liberal theories on a range of public policy issues.

Those who are skeptical that global warming is legitimate, and chiefly caused by humans, are racist.


“People who don’t believe that climate change is real are more likely to be old, more likely to be Republican, and more likely to be white. They are also more likely to have racist beliefs,” the opening lines of a new Sierra Club article say.

“This correlation is a relatively recent phenomenon – one that occurred in the wake of Barack Obama’s election in 2008,” the article continued.

The narrative frames Obama as an environmental moderate who rejected the Keystone XL pipeline due to its alleged harmful effects on climate, but also says he was “too cautious” when it came to driving home more radical policies.

The Environmental Politics study hypothesizes that opposing Barack Obama’s political agenda in relation to the environment was racism because Obama was the first black president.

More @: https://dailycaller.com/2018/06/19/sierra-club-climate-deniers-racists/



[ Benegal is not a scientist. He teaches political science at DePauw University, an expensive private liberal arts college in Greencastle, Indiana.]

The same rationale was used in the study to explain disagreements with Obama’s negotiated position in the Paris climate accords and with Obamacare.

[Cop]

STUDY: Decline of Polar Bears is Fake News
[Excerpts]

A new report by the U.K.-based Global Warming Policy Foundation disproves the popular narrative that climate change is killing off the polar bear population.

The report was compiled by zoologist Dr. Susan Crockford, and says that although Arctic sea-ice has declined recently, the numbers of polar bears have remained stable and have actually increased slightly.

In one region where polar bear numbers have dropped, the reason isn’t too little sea-ice, but too much of it.

“Ice levels during the key feeding period in Spring have been good, and prey species have been abundant. It’s not really a surprise that polar bears are doing so well,” Crockford said in a press release.

“The fearmongering from the media and the polar bear specialists is now backfiring,” Crockford added. “They convinced the world that polar bears were doomed but the facts got out. Now would be a good time to set the story straight.”

The report chastises media for over-hyping “scientifically insignificant events” to push global warming.

he Executive Summary includes the following points:
Global polar bear numbers have been stable or risen slightly since 2005, despite the fact that summer sea ice since 2007 hit levels not expected until mid-century: the predicted 67 percent decline in polar bear numbers did not occur.

Abundant prey and adequate sea ice in spring and early summer since 2007 appear to explain why global polar bear numbers have not declined, as might have been expected as a result of low summer sea ice levels.

The greatest change in sea ice habitat since 1979 was experienced by Barents Sea polar bears and the least by those in Southern Hudson Bay, the most southerly region inhabited by bears.

As far as is known, the record low extent of sea ice in March 2017 had no impact on polar bear health or survival.

Some studies show bears are lighter in weight than they were in the 1980s, but none showed an increase in the number of individuals starving to death or too thin to reproduce.

A just-released report of Southern Beaufort Sea bears having difficulty finding prey in 2014– 2016 suggests that the thick ice events that have impacted the region every ten years or so since the 1960s have continued despite reduced summer sea ice.


Claims of widespread hybridization of polar bears with grizzlies were disproven by DNA studies.

Overly pessimistic media responses to recent polar bear issues have made heartbreaking news out of scientifically insignificant events, suggesting an attempt is being made to restore the status of this failed global warming icon.


Source: https://www.utahstandardnews.com/study-decline-polar-bears-fake-news/

[Cop]

FAKE NEWS: WashPost Blames ‘Sinking’ Pacific Island on Global Warming
[Excerpts]

In yet another example of a journalist behaving like activist, a prominent news reporter travelled to the Pacific Island nation of Kiribati to document the devastating effects of global warming first-hand.

Tragically, Kiribati is sinking into the ocean and will soon disappear forever, Joshua Keating wrote in a recent Washington Post feature article entitled “The Sinking State.”

But the people of Kiribati beg to differ, as truth advocacy group Just Facts reported earlier this week. They’re quite aware that their home island is not sinking at all. In fact, it’s growing.

Keating seized on this and claimed that “not that long from now” global warming will “probably” destroy Kiribati.

It may be “one of the first” nations, he added, to be “wiped out by the effects of climate change.”

Scientific studies, however, have drawn opposite conclusions in recent years, as Just Facts pointed out.

A 2010 study published in the journal Global and Planetary Change used aerial and satellite data to conduct “the first quantitative analysis of physical changes” in 27 Pacific coral reef islands, including those in Kiribati.

The paper’s scientific authors said the “results of this study contradict widespread perceptions that all reef islands are eroding in response to recent sea level rise.”

A 2013 scholarly paper in the journal Sustainability Science examined “changes in shoreline position on the majority of reef islands” in the capital city of Tarawa from 1943 to 2007. It found that these islands “substantially increased in size.”

But facts are sometimes inconvenient to journalists with agendas.

Amazingly, Keating went so far as to say that the Kiribati people’s reluctance to join the climate change narrative was due to a “mental block” that makes them unwilling to face the truth.


More @ https://www.libertyheadlines.com/fake-news-washington-post-kiribati-climate-change/

[Cop]

Calif. Blames Global Warming for Pollution Caused by Its Own Bad Laws
[Excerpts]

Despite California’s best efforts, decades of ever-increasing environmental mandates have failed to produce the outdoor utopia the state’s progressive leaders have long promised.

But that doesn’t mean they won’t stop trying — no matter the consequences.

As this year’s heat waves and record wildfires have been blamed in large part, if not all, on climate change, another environmental catastrophe looks to be ripe for scapegoating.

According to the Los Angeles Times, Southern California went 87 days in a row this summer without clean air — the largest stretch of bad air in nearly 20 years.

An “environmental engineering” professor from the University of California-Davis said the dubious record should be a serious “wake up call.”

But instead of a course correction, California environmentalists and community groups say the string of smoggy days is a symptom of “insufficient regulation,” and they’re taking aim at the usual suspects — diesel trucks, shipping ports and oil companies.

Tom Tanton, director of the Energy and Environmental Legal Institute, says that is the exact wrong approach.

Tanton not only disagrees, but he pins much of California’s environmental problems on the very regulations that were supposed to solve them. He says it’s a case of unintended consequences followed by politically-motivated doubling- and tripling-down.

“What if current regulations, in addition to killing jobs, are actually adding to our pollution problems not solving them?” he proposed in a Forbes article.

“The Left regulates and regulates in an effort to reduce so-called greenhouse gases – without ever asking if it is really working,” he explained.

With 40 years of experience in the field of energy and environmental policy, Tanton says that California is the “poster child of what not to do,” and contends that the state’s regulations are killing jobs — some 500,000 manufacturing jobs over the past 25 years — in addition to adding to the state’s pollution problems.


More @: https://www.libertyheadlines.com/california-blames-cow-flatulence/


[2 Peter 3:5 "For this they willingly are ignorant of,...]

[Cop]

UN: Global Warming Causes Mental Illness!!
[Excerpts]

 A landmark United Nations report revealed that catastrophic events induced by climate change could become regular occurrences as soon as 2040.

The UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts disastrous effects around the world if greenhouse gas emissions continue to increase at their current rate.
Previously, scientists believed these severe consequences would happen if the planet warmed by 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit); now, the threshold is only 1.5 C (2.7 F).

Another related study highlights the extreme toll climate change has already taken on the human psyche, 22 years before the 2040 warning.

Short-term exposure to extreme weather, multi-year warming, and tropical cyclone exposure are all associated with worsened mental health, scientists affirm in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“Our paper — when coupled with evidence that climate change may impact everyday human moods to severe outcomes like suicide — provides further evidence that exposure to heat, on average, worsens mental health outcomes,” study co-author and MIT Media Lab research scientist Nick Obradovich, Ph.D., tells Inverse.

Obradovich and his colleagues reached this conclusion by analyzing the mental health data of nearly 2 million Americans, as well as daily meteorological and climatic data taken between 2002 and 2012.

“If we push global temperature rise into the 2 degrees-plus Celsius range, the impacts on human well-being, including mental health, may be catastrophic,” he says.
Between 2002 and 2012, approximately 2 million individuals reported the state of their mental health through a CDC survey.

Each respondent was asked to report how stress, depression, and “problems with emotions” affected their mental health over a period of 30 days.

When Obradovich and his colleagues evaluated those responses alongside data concerning multi-year warming, they discovered that, on average, monthly temperatures hotter than 30 degrees Celsius — or 86 degrees Fahrenheit — were associated with more reports of mental health difficulties.


More@: https://www.inverse.com/article/49698-climate-change-negative-mental-health


[At last...we have an explanation for the utter stupidity that has engulfed our nation!!!]

[Wally]

Al Gore never shows up in Maine during January.  I wonder why?  Winter started a month early, and we're headed for the deep freeze this weekend.  I  believe I will increase my "carbon footprint" by adding more wood to the fire, and breathing out a bit more CO2 while splitting more wood.

[JimB]

Good for you Wally, I'll take some of your extra C0₂ to reduce my heating bill. But of course you realize it's not "global warming" anymore it's called "climate change" now so your month early winter fits right in with their narrative.

[Wally]

They keep changing the narrative.  Only among activists (and the complicit media) is "climate change" a serious concern.  The media over reports news that seems to bolster their theory, while ignoring stories that present a different picture.

It's a balmy 0° F right now, and dropping.  Time to stuff another log in the wood stove.

[Wally]

UN: Global Warming Causes Mental Illness!!
[Excerpts]

 

A very convenient conclusion.  Now they can claim that all of those who don't believe in global warming are mentally deranged.

[Cop]

Astronaut-Geologist Says ‘No Evidence’ Exists to Support Man-Made Climate Change
[Excerpts]

 Apollo 17 astronaut Harrison “Jack” Schmitt was the last of 12 human beings to have ever walked on the moon. He’s also among a handful of people to boldly challenge climate change theory from within the elite scientific community.

“...I’m a geologist. I know the Earth is not nearly as fragile as we tend to think it is. It has gone through climate change, it is going through climate change at the present time,” Schmitt said.

He then asked the audience, “Is there any evidence that human beings are causing that change? ”The reply was a resounding, “yes.”

Wrong again, Schmitt said.

“Right now, in my profession, there is no evidence. There are models. But models of very, very complex natural systems are often wrong. The observations that we make as geologists, and observational climatologists, do not show any evidence that human beings are causing this,” he explained.

One of the leading climate models is produced by the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and last week the IPCC released a new report predicting an oncoming irreversible climate doomsday.

St. Fleur pounced on the IPCC report when challenging Schmitt: “There was a huge report that just came out last week [talking about] the risk and what is going to happen … as soon as 2040.”

The report calls for “urgent and unprecedented changes” at the high-end of the Paris Climate Agreement “to keep temperatures between 1.5 degrees Celsius and 2 degrees Celsius.” If not, the authors predict a climate catastrophe.

But the IPCC is hardly infallible, as Canadian climate experts Tim Ball and Tom Harris point out in a recent Washington Times analysis.

“The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change climate forecasts were wrong from their earliest reports in 1990. They were so inaccurate that they stopped calling them forecasts and made three ‘projections’: low, medium, and high. Since then, even their ‘low’ scenario projections were wrong,” they wrote on Monday.

They further explained that the IPCC creates an illusion of certainty about their reports and forecasts by giving the impression that they are studying all causes of climate change, rather than just man-made pollution.

“It allow(s) them to ignore all non-human causes of change, including the Sun,” they said.

“I, as a scientist, expect to have people question orthodoxy. And we always used to do that. Now, unfortunately, funding by governments, particularly the United States government, is biasing science toward what the government wants to hear. That’s a very dangerous thing that’s happening in science today, and it’s not just in climate,” Schmitt said.

More @: https://www.libertyheadlines.com/astronaut-blasts-climate-change/

[Cop]

Al Gore Admits UN Climate Change Report is ‘Torqued Up’
[Excerpts]

‘How [else] do they get the attention of policy-makers around the world?’

 Former vice president and climate change activist Al Gore recently warned that climate change is an “existential threat” and that President Donald Trump’s pragmatic approach is a dangerous “outlier reaction,” while confessing that a major U.N. climate report was sensationalized to get people to take notice.

But the most unpredictable portion of the exchange occurred when Woodruff brought up the latest United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change report—the gold standard among climate change alarmists.

In an odd admission, Gore said the report was artificially enhanced in order to cause a stir—and rightly so, from his point of view.

“The language that the IPCC used in presenting it was torqued up a little bit, appropriately—how [else] do they get the attention of policy-makers around the world?” he said.

The causal acknowledgment of misleading information is stunning considering the scope of economic and political actions Gore and others say is necessary to stem an oncoming global warming crisis.

...the IPCC authors predict a climate catastrophe by 2040.

That deadline, however, is 24 years after Gore himself said the world would reach a “point of no return.”

In Gore’s 2006 Oscar winning climate change documentary An Inconvenient Truth, he said the earth was in a “true planetary emergency” that would end in disaster in 2016 if the Bush administration didn’t take “drastic measures.”

It didn’t, but the goalposts have now moved to 2040. Gore would be 93 years old.


Source: http://remnant-online.com/smf/index.php?action=post;topic=6844.60;last_msg=194360

[So it is now OK to lie to achieve your goal?]

[Marelis]

Climate change is a integral part of the school curriculum. Children are being encouraged to be activists.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiXyoeVkJ_gAhVei3AKHUB-ClcQzPwBegQIARAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.canberratimes.com.au%2Fnational%2Fact%2Fthese-kids-are-going-on-strike-to-protest-the-climate-emergency-20181115-p50g8p.html&psig=AOvVaw2owR-Pa_RW_s34j6tnIAKh&ust=1549268262938194

My children were taught in school the mantra, "think globally, act locally." From the cradle babes are being trained to think as "world citizens." There is a movement trying to get the world on board to work together as a united front "for the common good." We know where it's leading. This is not to say that we ought not to be responsible citizens who care for our planet.

[Cop]

Harrison Ford Laments Climate Change While Flying Private Jets Everywhere
[Excerpts]

Actor Harrison Ford took the stage at the World Government Summit in Dubai Monday to offer his policy musings.

His message? That climate change is humanity’s greatest threat, and that progress is being impeded by those who won’t commit doing what’s right.

“We are faced with what I believe is the greatest moral crisis of our time,” said Ford, mustering the gravitas of his four-decade silver-screen career.

But as critics of celebrity climate-change holy-rollers often observe, Ford has a terrible record of practicing what he preaches.

The actor, whose net worth is an estimated $230 million, is an avid private air traveler.

He once boasted in an interview that, “I’m so passionate about flying, I often fly up the coast for a cheeseburger.”

In June 2015, Ford was spotted in London disembarking from his massive private jet.

According to the Institute for Policy Studies, a single private jet trip contributes more greenhouse gases than the average American does in an entire year.

Ford took his private jet to celebrate fellow “Star Wars” actor Mark Hamill’s Hollywood Star on the city’s touristy “Walk of Fame” last year.

And he even bragged about his collection of private airplanes and gas-guzzling hot-rod cars in another 2018 interview.

But in Dubai, Ford also lamented how people all over the Western world are fighting back against elitist and governmental efforts to impose vast economic and political climate diktats on their own populations.

“They are on the wrong side of history,” Ford said.

Source: https://www.libertyheadlines.com/harrison-ford-climate-change-jet/

[Cop]

Climate Alarmist Bernie Sanders Is Addicted to Carbon-Spewing Private Jets
[Excerpts]

It was “a running joke” inside Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign: Bernie Sanders, the socialist climate change alarmist, loved using private jets.

According to Politico, Sanders often requested to use Clinton campaign jets while helping Hillary during the general election — only months after the Clinton-controlled DNC allegedly cheated him in the Democratic primary.

The Clinton campaign told Sanders private jets were a needless extravagance and asked the senator to fly commercial, but Sanders claimed flying private was the only way he could make Hillary’s various campaign stops.

The self-identifying socialist U.S. senator from Vermont liked using a Gulfstream plane, and he racked-up at least $100,000 in flight costs over three separate multi-day trips in the last two months of the failed campaign.

Since then, Sanders has continued to fly on private jets at a cost of more than $342,000.

The 2020 presidential contender’s lavish hypocrisy is at odds with his working-man schtick to thwart the privileged rich, and his radical sky-is-falling embrace of climate change.

“Climate change is not only real, it is already doing irreparable harm all over this planet, including the United States of America,” he told CBS’s “Face the Nation” last November. “What Congress has got to do is take Trump on, take the fossil fuel industry on, and transform our energy system away from fossil fuel, to energy efficiency and sustainable energies like solar and wind.”

Marc Morano, the executive editor of ClimateDepot.com, called it “rank hypocrisy” on Tuesday.

Speaking on “Fox & Friends,” Morano said, “Outside of Al Gore, in electoral politics, Bernie was the guy as the number one ‘climate guru”… and he just can’t keep himself out of these private jets.”

Source: https://www.libertyheadlines.com/climate-bernie-sanders-private-jets/

[Wally]

Socialist philosophy only applies to the "unwashed masses," not to the wise and benevolent leaders who must not be restricted in their efforts to "improve" the lot of the common man. 

By the way, I've just installed the windmill on my car, but for some reason, the car won't move.     Maybe Bernie can help me with this.  He'll have to use a helicopter to get here though, as my landing strip is covered with CO2 loving trees.   

[Cop]

Socialist philosophy only applies to the "unwashed masses," not to the wise and benevolent leaders who must not be restricted in their efforts to "improve" the lot of the common man. 

By the way, I've just installed the windmill on my car, but for some reason, the car won't move.     Maybe Bernie can help me with this.  He'll have to use a helicopter to get here though, as my landing strip is covered with CO2 loving trees.   

You either have to cry for the blindness of so many, in and out of the Church, or to laugh for joy that we can plainly see the end of sin and the return of our Saviour.

The sheer madness and hypocrisy of those who think they are more intelligent than the common man, who is so ignorant, that we need the 'enlightened ones' to direct us through life. It is so plain to those who study God's Word that what is taking place is the Evil One's plan for world rule.

[Richard Myers]

I can't help but laugh when I hear that 15 million years ago, something fantastic happened. I don't remember what it was, but it was laughable. Then there was the explosion some billions of years ago. I don't recall the reporter who witnessed the event.   Science?     So called. And these are the really smart ones with letters after their names. The ones who say the world is going to freeze 40 years ago, and now tell us we don't have to worry about freezing, we are going to have warmer temps. I am relieved, we will be able to grow veggies in Alaska and Siberia. God is in control and allows Satan to play these games so that we will understand our continual need of a Savior.

Have a blessed Sabbath dear friends. Jesus is coming soon!

[Cop]

Students at UN Stage ‘Die-In’ to Protest Climate Inaction
[Excerpts]

Dozens of young climate change activists staged a “die-in” in front of the United Nations on Friday, lying sprawled on the pavement to draw attention to the lethal consequences of global warming, as part of a left-wing shakedown orchestrated by the radical Sunrise Movement.

“Today, the young people of the US are declaring the era of American climate change denialism over,” said Alexandria Villasenor, a 13-year-old who has been staging a climate strike outside the UN headquarters every Friday since December.

“We are here to tell leaders that they urgently act.”

Tens of thousands of teenagers and schoolchildren took to the streets worldwide on Friday to push world leaders to take action to combat climate change.

According to The Nation, Friday’s staged protest, which incorporated Green New Deal advocacy, was to involve tens of thousands of middle- and high-school students in 30-some countries, disrupting many a classroom in the process.

The Sunrise Movement’s campaign ultimately produced the lawsuit Juliana vs. United States and several other spin-offs that used children as the plaintiffs to spur policies to address global warming.

Organizations such as Our Children’s Trust now provide teams of lawyers to help coach and direct the juveniles, doted upon by the liberal 9th Circuit court in San Francisco, to launch their attacks on energy producers.

However, the children’s lawsuits have met with mixed results elsewhere.

In January, the Colorado Supreme Court shot down a bid by a group of Boulder teens to block future drilling permits in the state.

Source: https://www.libertyheadlines.com/students-united-nations-climate-die-in/