A poll released on Monday showed that 62 percent of voters believe that it is at least somewhat likely that progressives will commit acts of violence if President Donald Trump wins reelection.
The poll, conducted by JustTheNews.com, found that more than one third of voters, 34 percent, think that it is very likely that progressives will respond violently to a Trump reelection, Ballotpedia reported.
Voters were far less likely to believe that conservative Republicans would respond with violence if former Vice President Joe Biden—currently the presumptive Democrat nominee—won the 2020 presidential election.
“It is interesting to note that last week more people thought Republicans would cheat rather than Democrats,” said Rasmussen.
Slightly more than one third, 38 percent, of voters said they saw conservative-backed violence as at least somewhat likely.
Only 16 percent said that they believed violence from conservatives is very likely.
Democrats are anticipating violence more heavily than Republicans, with 53 percent of those who identify as Democrats saying that violence is somewhat likely no matter the victor in the presidential election.
Republicans and independents believe that violence is more likely if Trump wins the election.
The JustTheNews poll follows month of organized political violence from neo-Marxist groups that are associated with the Democratic Party, including Black Lives Matter and Antifa.
Antifa and Black Lives Matter have indicated in their official platforms and rhetoric that they want to erase America’s culture, heritage and traditions, as well as eliminate capitalism, private healthcare, two-parent families and the rule of law.
A website called “A New Civil War” now tracks opinion and news article that discuss the prospects of a second civil war in the United States.
Source:
https://headlineusa.com/poll-2in3-voter-violent-reelection/?utm_source=HUSAemail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=HUSAemail-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dems: Best-Case Scenario for Trump Election Victory May Mean Civil WarAmerica may soon face the biggest lose–lose choice in its history: civil war or socialism.
The New York Times reported recently that the campaign of presumptive Democrat nominee Joe Biden and other top party allies were running through four different scenarios for the November election as part of a “wargames” exercise.
Alarmingly, its best-case scenario for President Donald Trump and his supporters still would result in three far-left states seceding from the union, likely resulting in a second Civil War.
Big League Stew wrote that the hypothetical scenario imagined as part of the highly partisan, Orwellian-sounding Transition Integrity Project would transpire if Trump secured a resounding Electoral College victory, as he did in 2016, but again lost the official popular vote tally.
Party officials would then look to blue-led battleground states—such as Michigan and Wisconsin—to refuse to cast their electoral votes for Trump and instead send their delegates to the Democrat House of Representatives to recognize Biden.
Should Trump nonetheless prevail in that scenario, though, the hypothetical—which saw former Hillary Clinton stooge John Podesta standing in for Biden—then would have California, Washington and Oregon seceding.
“The roleplay of the event ended when organizers determined the American people would look to the military to resolve the situation,” reported Big League Stew.
Unfortunately, given the ways in which Democrats have stacked the deck, this is likely to be the best-case scenario for Trump.
According to Ballotpedia, as of last week both California and Vermont have established policies that will involve automatic mail-in ballots being sent “to all voters in the Nov. 3 general election.”
Already, California has proven—as have several other states during recent primaries—how disastrous this will be for vote tallying and integrity.
While it could be assumed that the state’s electoral votes would go to Biden (or whoever the eventual Democrat nominee is) California’s refusal to heed warnings from election-integrity watchdogs will, effectively, invalidate its count in the popular-vote tally.
Evidence has pointed to the fact that even using presumably legitimate means for vote-tallying, much of Hillary Clinton’s alleged 2.8 million popular-vote advantage in 2016 may come from loosely regulated blue regions that permitted systemic vote fraud.
In Los Angeles alone, the county reluctantly agreed in a legal settlement to purge millions of ineligible voters from its rolls last year.
And yet, the problems of duplicate ballots, mishandling, illegal voting and other integrity-destroying factors continue to be widespread.
Moreover, California’s subsequent legalization of ballot-harvesting played a major role in several Republican upsets during the 2018 midterms under particularly dubious circumstances.
In at least one case, also in Los Angeles, activists were charged with attempting to bribe residents of a homeless shelter for their votes.
Although California has faced an exodus of many residents and is projected to see a net loss of congressional seats, the recent influx of illegal immigrants to “sanctuary cities” that refuse to cooperate with federal authorities may also impact the election.
Several of these have begun issuing drivers’ licenses to illegals, making it easier yet to sow chaos and confusion at the polling place.
Because the impact of California and Vermont alone still could not sway the count in the Electoral College, the Democrat state officials in Nevada also joined in to secretly pass its own mail-in ballot scam.
Although the state has tended blue recently, it is still very much in play. Trump tweeted his outrage at the corrupt scheme on Monday and threatened to challenge the laws in court, according to Breitbart.
Source:
https://headlineusa.com/best-case-trump-election-civil-war/?utm_source=HUSAemail&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=HUSAemail["In India, China, Russia, and the cities of America, thousands of men and women are dying of starvation. The monied men, because they have the power, control the market. They purchase at low rates all they can obtain, and then sell at greatly increased prices. This means starvation to the poorer classes, and will result in a civil war." {Ms114-1899.7}]
